{"id":3341787,"date":"2019-10-03T14:33:35","date_gmt":"2019-10-03T14:33:35","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/womensnetwork.org\/?p=3341787"},"modified":"2019-10-31T10:41:26","modified_gmt":"2019-10-31T10:41:26","slug":"reagim-gjyqesori-edhe-njehere-deshton-ne-mbrojtjen-juridike-te-barazise-gjinore","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/womensnetwork.org\/sq\/reagim-gjyqesori-edhe-njehere-deshton-ne-mbrojtjen-juridike-te-barazise-gjinore\/","title":{"rendered":"Gjyq\u00ebsori edhe nj\u00ebher\u00eb d\u00ebshton n\u00eb mbrojtjen juridike t\u00eb barazis\u00eb gjinore"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Rrjeti i Grave t\u00eb Kosov\u00ebs (RrGK), \u00ebsht\u00eb njoftuar p\u00ebr aktvendimin e marr\u00eb nga Gjykata Themelore n\u00eb Prishtin\u00eb lidhur me propozimin p\u00ebr Mas\u00eb t\u00eb P\u00ebrkohshme t\u00eb paraqitur n\u00eb padin\u00eb nga ana e Avokatit t\u00eb Popullit kundrejt Komisionit Qendror t\u00eb Zgjedhjeve (KQZ), p\u00ebr mosp\u00ebrfaq\u00ebsim t\u00eb barabart\u00eb t\u00eb grave n\u00eb lista zgjedhore. Masa e p\u00ebrkohshme ka pasur p\u00ebr q\u00ebllim suspendimin e efekteve juridike t\u00eb \u00e7ertifikimit t\u00eb listave zgjedhore t\u00eb cilat nuk kan\u00eb garantuar p\u00ebrfaq\u00ebsimin e barabart\u00eb gjinor t\u00eb k\u00ebrkuar me Ligjin p\u00ebr Barazi Gjinore, votuar nga ana e deputet\u00ebve t\u00eb Kuvendit t\u00eb Republik\u00ebs s\u00eb Kosov\u00ebs n\u00eb muajin qershor t\u00eb vitit 2015. RrGK shpreh indinjim t\u00eb thell\u00eb kundrejt munges\u00ebs s\u00eb vullnetit t\u00eb institucioneve t\u00eb drejt\u00ebsis\u00eb p\u00ebr t\u00eb bashk\u00ebpunuar me Avokatin e Popullit n\u00eb adresimin e \u00e7\u00ebshtjeve t\u00eb pabarazis\u00eb gjinore.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Gjykata Themelore n\u00eb Prishtin\u00eb, e ka hedhur posht\u00eb propozimin p\u00ebr Mas\u00ebn e P\u00ebrkohshme n\u00eb fjal\u00eb duke supozuar se Avokati i Popullit nuk e ka b\u00ebr\u00eb t\u00eb besueshme k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn e tij dhe se i njejti nuk ka paraqitur fakte n\u00eb t\u00eb cilat mb\u00ebshtet\u00eb k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn p\u00ebr caktimin e mas\u00ebs s\u00eb p\u00ebrkohshme, p\u00ebr rishikimin e listave zgjedhore t\u00eb partive politike.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Tutje, Gjykata n\u00eb aktvendimin e saj k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn e Avokatit t\u00eb Popullit e ka cil\u00ebsuar si t\u00eb pa-bazuar dhe si jo urgjente, ani pse zgjedhjet komb\u00ebtare jan\u00eb n\u00eb prag dhe se si rrjedhoj\u00eb e k\u00ebtij mos-veprimi institucional grat\u00eb nuk do t\u00eb p\u00ebrfaq\u00ebsohen n\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb t\u00eb barabart\u00eb.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Sidoqoft\u00eb, p\u00ebrkund\u00ebr vendimit t\u00eb marr\u00eb, Avokati i Popullit n\u00eb K\u00ebrkes\u00eb-padin\u00eb e tij ka dh\u00ebn\u00eb statistika konkrete t\u00eb jo-proporcionalitetit t\u00eb p\u00ebrfaq\u00ebsimit t\u00eb grave n\u00eb listat zgjedhore, gj\u00eb q\u00eb p\u00ebrb\u00ebn faktor evident dhe d\u00ebshmi se ekziston diskriminimi me baz\u00eb gjinore si diskriminim grupor. Sipas\u00a0<strong>Nenit 16 t\u00eb Ligjit p\u00ebr Avokatin e Popullit<\/strong>, ky i fundit ka t\u00eb drejt\u00eb t\u00eb filloj\u00eb hetimin e shkeljeve apo lirive t\u00eb t\u00eb drejtave t\u00eb njeriut, n\u00eb em\u00ebr t\u00eb nj\u00eb numri t\u00eb madh t\u00eb qytetar\u00ebve. Si rrjedhoj\u00eb, n\u00eb kuad\u00ebr t\u00eb k\u00ebtij neni Avokati i Popullit konsiderohet p\u00ebrfaq\u00ebsues i grupit t\u00eb c\u00ebnuar nga e drejta \u2013 si subjekt i k\u00ebrkes\u00ebs s\u00eb hedhur posht\u00eb nga gjykata, dhe meq\u00eb lista e kandidat\u00ebve zgjedhor si e t\u00ebr\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb diskriminuese, i takon gjykat\u00ebs q\u00eb t\u00eb veproj\u00eb urgjentisht.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Poashtu, si\u00e7\u00a0parashihet edhe me Ligjin p\u00ebr Barazi Gjinore p\u00ebr p\u00ebrfaq\u00ebsimin e barabart\u00eb si dhe Nenin 18 t\u00eb Ligjit p\u00ebr Mbrojtje nga Diskriminimi lidhur me diskriminimin grupor n\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb eksplicite ceket se \u201cRastet e diskriminimit t\u00eb cilat prekin grupet e personave mund t\u00eb inicohen n\u00ebp\u00ebrmjet nj\u00eb veprimi grupor t\u00eb nd\u00ebrmarr\u00eb n\u00eb em\u00ebr t\u00eb tyre nga nj\u00eb organizat\u00eb jo-qeveritare ose nga Avokati i Popullit, n\u00eb raste t\u00eb tilla, nuk k\u00ebrkohet p\u00eblqimi i an\u00ebtar\u00ebve t\u00eb grupit.\u201d Poashtu ligji specifikon se\u00a0veprimet e tilla ligjore dor\u00ebzohen n\u00eb gjykat\u00ebn kompetente, me pretendimin i cili vendos se sjellja e till\u00eb ka shkelur t\u00eb drejt\u00ebn p\u00ebr trajtim t\u00eb barabart\u00eb n\u00eb raport me pjes\u00ebtar\u00ebt e grupit si dhe ndalon nd\u00ebrmarrjen e veprimtarive t\u00eb cilat shkelin apo mund t\u00eb shkelin t\u00eb drejt\u00ebn p\u00ebr trajtim t\u00eb barabart\u00eb, nga ana e gjykat\u00ebs kompente (Ligji kund\u00ebr Diskriminimit, Neni18, paragrafi 3).<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Vendimi i Gjykat\u00ebs mbi arsyetimin se k\u00ebrkesa e Avokatit t\u00eb Popullit nuk ka qen\u00eb konkrete, sepse masat e sigurimit t\u00eb cilat mund t\u00eb caktohen jan\u00eb t\u00eb num\u00ebrta dhe Avokati i Popullit \u201cnuk ka specifikuar se cila mas\u00eb e sigurimit nga LPK duhet t\u00eb nd\u00ebrmirret\u201d q\u00ebndron rrjedhimisht i pabaz\u00eb.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Poashtu nj\u00eb k\u00ebrkes\u00eb e till\u00eb ka qen\u00eb e p\u00ebrfshir\u00eb n\u00eb k\u00ebrkes\u00eb-padin\u00eb e Avokatit t\u00eb Popullit p\u00ebr l\u00ebshimin e mas\u00ebs s\u00eb p\u00ebrkohshme, si n\u00eb vijim:<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u201cK\u00ebrkohet nga gjykata q\u00eb t\u00eb ndaloj\u00eb nd\u00ebrmarrjen e veprimtarive t\u00eb cilat shkelin apo mund t\u00eb shkelin t\u00eb drejt\u00ebn p\u00ebr trajtim t\u00eb barabart\u00eb, apo t\u00eb kryejn\u00eb veprimtari t\u00eb cilat eliminojn\u00eb diskriminimin apo\u00a0pasojat e tij n\u00eb lidhje me trajtimin e pabarabart\u00eb t\u00eb grave n\u00eb t\u00eb drejtat zgjedhore dhe t\u00eb pjes\u00ebmarrjes.\u201d Poashtu, arsyetimi i dh\u00ebn\u00eb nga Gjykata n\u00eb refuzimin e k\u00ebrkes\u00ebs s\u00eb Avokatit t\u00eb Popullit p\u00ebr mas\u00ebn e p\u00ebrkohshme, ku k\u00ebrkohet q\u00eb Avokati Popullit t\u00eb ket\u00eb d\u00ebrguar se kush jan\u00eb subjektet\/individ\u00ebt q\u00eb nuk jan\u00eb p\u00ebrfshir\u00eb n\u00eb list\u00ebn zgjedhore, \u00ebsht\u00eb non-sens juridik i cili del p\u00ebrtej k\u00ebrkes\u00ebs, meq\u00eb ka t\u00eb b\u00ebj m\u00eb diskriminim grupor q\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb v\u00ebrtetuar qart\u00eb me k\u00ebrkes\u00ebn e Avokatit t\u00eb Popullit meq\u00eb\u00a0\u00e7\u00ebshtja ka t\u00eb b\u00ebj\u00eb me mund\u00ebsin\u00eb p\u00ebr p\u00ebrfaq\u00ebsim t\u00eb barabart\u00eb sipas k\u00ebrkesave t\u00eb Ligjit p\u00ebr Barazi Gjinore.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\">K\u00ebrkesa e till\u00eb e p\u00ebrfshir\u00eb n\u00eb padin\u00eb e Avokatit t\u00eb Popullit, do t\u00eb mund t\u00eb ekzekutohej me karakter t\u00eb p\u00ebrkohsh\u00ebm, ashtu si\u00e7\u00a0\u00ebsht\u00eb e p\u00ebrcaktuar n\u00eb LPK, n\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb q\u00eb t\u00eb mos prejudikohet\u00a0\u00e7\u00ebshtja kryesore, por t\u00eb veprohet n\u00eb kuad\u00ebr t\u00eb k\u00ebsaj k\u00ebrkese deri sa t\u00eb v\u00ebrtetohen rrethanat faktike. Me an\u00eb t\u00eb refuzimit t\u00eb mas\u00ebs s\u00eb p\u00ebrkohshme, n\u00eb fakt gjykata vet\u00eb ka prejudikuar edhe zgjedhjen lidhur me\u00a0\u00e7\u00ebshtjen kryesore t\u00eb padis\u00eb n\u00eb fjal\u00eb.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Mos-njohja e legjislacionit p\u00ebrkat\u00ebs nga ana e gjykat\u00ebs dhe parimeve t\u00eb Ligjit kund\u00ebr Diskriminimit si dhe Ligjit p\u00ebr Barazi Gjinore \u00ebsht\u00eb shqet\u00ebsuese dhe kjo tregon edhe nj\u00eb vendim i cili n\u00eb fakt ka nxjerr\u00eb padin\u00eb p\u00ebr grupet e diskriminuara nga zbatimi praktik, duke shkelur parimet e legjislacionit p\u00ebrkat\u00ebs dhe duke pamund\u00ebsuar poashtu edhe p\u00ebrdorimin e t\u00eb drejt\u00ebs s\u00eb ankimimit me vendimin e Gjykat\u00ebs Themelore n\u00eb fjal\u00eb.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Rrjeti i Grave t\u00eb Kosov\u00ebs edhe nj\u00eb her\u00eb e konsideron t\u00eb papranueshme munges\u00ebn e njohuris\u00eb s\u00eb ligjeve t\u00eb pakos s\u00eb drejtave t\u00eb njeriut n\u00eb Kosov\u00eb si dhe munges\u00ebn e gatishm\u00ebris\u00eb s\u00eb institucioneve t\u00eb drejt\u00ebsis\u00eb t\u00eb reagojn\u00eb sipas k\u00ebrkesave ligjore, duke rrezikuar edhe zbatimin e k\u00ebtyre ligjeve n\u00eb praktik\u00eb. Poashtu RrGK d\u00ebnon edhe mos-gatishm\u00ebrin\u00eb e institucioneve p\u00ebrkat\u00ebse p\u00ebr t\u00eb hetuar m\u00eb tutje\u00a0\u00e7\u00ebshtjen e diskriminimit t\u00eb grave n\u00eb listat zgjedhore dhe munges\u00ebn e vullnetit t\u00eb tyre p\u00ebr t\u00eb kontribuar n\u00eb p\u00ebrfaq\u00ebsim t\u00eb barabart\u00eb gjinor.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Rrjeti i Grave t\u00eb Kosov\u00ebs (RrGK), \u00ebsht\u00eb njoftuar p\u00ebr aktvendimin e marr\u00eb nga Gjykata Themelore n\u00eb Prishtin\u00eb lidhur me propozimin p\u00ebr Mas\u00eb t\u00eb P\u00ebrkohshme t\u00eb paraqitur n\u00eb padin\u00eb nga ana e Avokatit t\u00eb Popullit kundrejt Komisionit Qendror t\u00eb Zgjedhjeve (KQZ), p\u00ebr mosp\u00ebrfaq\u00ebsim t\u00eb barabart\u00eb t\u00eb grave n\u00eb lista zgjedhore. Masa e p\u00ebrkohshme ka pasur p\u00ebr [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":3341780,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_FSMCFIC_featured_image_caption":"","_FSMCFIC_featured_image_nocaption":"","_FSMCFIC_featured_image_hide":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[82,3],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3341787","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-deklaratat-per-shtyp","category-uncategorized-sq"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/womensnetwork.org\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3341787","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/womensnetwork.org\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/womensnetwork.org\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/womensnetwork.org\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/womensnetwork.org\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3341787"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/womensnetwork.org\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3341787\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3342415,"href":"https:\/\/womensnetwork.org\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3341787\/revisions\/3342415"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/womensnetwork.org\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/3341780"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/womensnetwork.org\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3341787"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/womensnetwork.org\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3341787"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/womensnetwork.org\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3341787"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}